It's funny that you ascribed a political slant to me.
Go back and read every comment I've made as if I'm a 65 year old white man with greying hair who's voted Republican every year except this one because I didn't approve of Trump's handling of Coronavirus.
Does anything change? Do my comments ring any less true?
As I explained above, you also don't believe just those images that got them banned, it's the context they exist in that matters, that's literally what the next line says!
And of course I explained exactly why I can confidently say Parler's ratio of hate speech would be higher... because their differentiator is literally not moderating hate speech since it counts as free speech.
> because their differentiator is literally not moderating hate speech since it counts as free speech.
False. Have already shown with evidence that they were indeed moderating hate speech and did indeed have it clearly, unambiguously defined in their guidelines. No matter how much you try to twist it the facts are staring back in your face. That guidelines do exist.
There is literally no differentiator between Twitter and Parler. Both take their own sweet time to moderate violent content/hate speech. Yet Amazon finds Parler not moderating "with urgency" a requirement to terminate business with Parler while renewing cloud contracts with Twitter for the same damn thing. I haven't seen a bigger hypocritical bunch.
And what will this lead to? Fragmentation and balkanization of the internet.
> Have already shown with evidence that they were indeed moderating hate speech and did indeed have it clearly, unambiguously defined in their guidelines.
You have not done this. Parler allows hate speech.
Parler literally takes it as a principle that they only "censor" illegal content and span jurisdiction. That excludes hate speech.
Hate speech is not illegal in Parler and Twitter's jurisdiction for the hundredth time.
Parler literally says it doesn't allow itself to be used for "civil tort". I can't argue with you if you refuse to even acknowledge the legal terminology used here.
Go back and read every comment I've made as if I'm a 65 year old white man with greying hair who's voted Republican every year except this one because I didn't approve of Trump's handling of Coronavirus.
Does anything change? Do my comments ring any less true?
As I explained above, you also don't believe just those images that got them banned, it's the context they exist in that matters, that's literally what the next line says!
And of course I explained exactly why I can confidently say Parler's ratio of hate speech would be higher... because their differentiator is literally not moderating hate speech since it counts as free speech.