No, you just seem to think for some reason that "justifying kicking off people generally thought of as good" means approving of this action.
They're not saying that kicking off people critical of them is good (i.e. something they personally approve of), but they're saying that it's reasonable.
I can't tell if you're trolling. They literally even themselves responded saying that while they wouldn't approve, they think it's something the company should be allowed to do.
If you can't understand the difference, that's on you.
And I can't tell if you're trolling, for the exact same reasons you gave. They gave a reply that should satisfy your question, and you drilled down again because it didn't use your exact words.
Do you not understand how comment threads works? I didn't drill down on the original person (because while I disagree with them, they're willing to accept the logical conclusions of their justification), but on someone who insisted that my statement was absurd, even after I repeatedly tried clarifying it.
I really had to go and dig to figure out what you were even talking about here. The "original person" was a separate sibling to this thread. Do you know how threads work? Because that was not part of this conversation.
I am not going to read everything you ever type in order to have the context to understand you.
They're not saying that kicking off people critical of them is good (i.e. something they personally approve of), but they're saying that it's reasonable.