Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Yes. The challenge is how to measure individual contributors. It’s easy in Sales, which is why salespeople can do very well without being managers. Harder with engineers, whose work is very interconnected.


For sure. And it's why frankly in my opinion it's very hard to scale software development effectively beyond 25-50 engineers. After that politics and faux-meritocracies take over as people lose personal touch with each other.

Not that small companies can't be hell, too.


Yes. Most good people know who the other good people are, but it’s hard to turn that into a plan fit for large companies.


Team mates, usually know who is a good engineer, and who's not - much more accurately than management. When I was in Google, Perf process was based on peers feedback, and it worked well.


How much variable in rewards and comp are based on the peer reviews?

Another challenge with large firms is the overall lack of variance.




Consider applying for YC's Winter 2026 batch! Applications are open till Nov 10

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: