Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

If you link properly, GPL isnt a problem: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23321448



You seem to mix that up with LGPL. With GPL the linked app also becomes GPL. With LGPL this is not the case; usually apps link to Qt dynamic libraries which is ok.


I guess that would work, the time and effort involved in getting end-users to link the application makes downloading a large Electron binary seem downright pleasant.


You can just ship your application with a dynamically linked Qt library file(s). There is no extra step for the user.


This is about LGPL


Correct, although LPGL is the primarily relevant one for Qt. Only a few relatively niche parts of it are under GPL.




Consider applying for YC's Fall 2025 batch! Applications are open till Aug 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: