The title makes it seem like they are talking about medical professionals vs general public.
But actually they are talking about reserving second doses for those who got the first dose, and the article says it's better to actually administer those doses, even if it means a delay on the second dose for people.
I hope that if people don’t bother to read the article they at least see your comment. Most of the comments here so far are debating the merits of what they assume from the title rather than the text of the article.
The title makes it seem like they are talking about medical professionals vs general public.
But actually they are talking about reserving second doses for those who got the first dose, and the article says it's better to actually administer those doses, even if it means a delay on the second dose for people.