Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

This made me reread the article[0] again (if we were talking about the same one) and I don't see any mention of interview ratings and job performance.

[0] - https://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/20/business/in-head-hunting-...



Hm? It's right there at the start:

"Years ago, we did a study to determine whether anyone at Google is particularly good at hiring. We looked at tens of thousands of interviews, and everyone who had done the interviews and what they scored the candidate, and how that person ultimately performed in their job. We found zero relationship.

...One of the things we’ve seen from all our data crunching is that G.P.A.’s are worthless as a criteria for hiring, and test scores are worthless — no correlation at all except for brand-new college grads, where there’s a slight correlation. Google famously used to ask everyone for a transcript and G.P.A.’s and test scores, but we don’t anymore, unless you’re just a few years out of school. We found that they don’t predict anything."


Seems counterintuitive. Naively, high GPA = High work ethic + IQ, which surely plays a role in job performance, no?


Of course, but that's where selection processes and psychometric considerations start to play havoc with naive correlations.




Consider applying for YC's Winter 2026 batch! Applications are open till Nov 10

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: