> But it seems likely that a federal judge is more likely to be a target
More likely than...? It would really help understand what you're thinking if you'd finish the sentence.
And I hope you aren't thinking "your average person". If we passed a law to address median risk disparities in all the places we could, essentially everything that isn't mandatory would be forbidden.
Was mostly responding to the parent comment of "You shouldn't get special privileges because you work for the government."
Maybe some people should get protection or consideration because of their occupation. Didn't mean to say that federal judges should have more than another occupation or situation that we may want to compare against.
Thanks for pointing out that I could have communicated more effectively, though.!
More likely than...? It would really help understand what you're thinking if you'd finish the sentence.
And I hope you aren't thinking "your average person". If we passed a law to address median risk disparities in all the places we could, essentially everything that isn't mandatory would be forbidden.