I'd be careful about relying on "updated" dates too heavily. As a professional technical writer, I've seen that some people bump the "updated" timestamp for any update, no matter how small. At other times it's bumped automatically by the build system. I think the best practice is to only bump the timestamp for substantial updates, or to use an explicit changelog at the bottom of the doc. But that practice isn't standardized across docs sites.
I encounter this "article update" problem a lot with Java blogs...
Baeldung instantly comes to mind. Every article I find there was last updated on 2020, but don't seem to have actually changed.