A lot of people aren't interested in discussing linked material and therefore reading it, they just want to have a discussion on the topic of the title.
And in the process turning this site in to a predictable talking-point forum that just gets triggered by random title keywords.
A few weeks back I saw a front page article written in terrible english, being factually wrong on almost all points (it was talking about tech history so you can be objectively wrong), and was like 2 pages of rambling - blogspam 101.
But the title was something complaining about Electron and it was clear that nobody read it and everyone was just bandwagoning on Electron.
Then there was that outrage about a guy who was maintaining faker.js and people spinning same old BS about licenses and how everyone should use GPL - meanwhile it was obvious nobody even looked at what the library did because none of the discussion applied.
So people interested in discussing points should maybe find a different site for this - it's really dragging down the quality of content.
Of course you will, but the point is that many people like you will find such a process more of a hassle than it's worth. My solution would reduce the amount of this happening significantly, even if it won't stop every do-badder...
