Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

No offense to you in particular - but every time something changes in US Healthcare to make it more "free", costs continue to rise apace and people exclaim, "If it were just a bit freer market, everything would be cheaper and things would be better."

It really strikes me as a no-true-scotsman's analysis of our health system. Why not just adopt one of the competing alternatives wholesale and admit defeat?




The way you describe it makes it sound like there’s some theoretical ideal that has never been attained, and there’s a group of people arguing for that...except that’s not true.

It’s important to have that discussion because it has implications on what approach we take. I think there’s generally broad agreement that the status quo is bad...there’s just violent disagreement as to why it’s bad. There are a number of ways to fix it (and not just the one proposal you keep hearing about).

Simply decoupling healthcare from employment while keeping it private is one approach. We know that this is efficient, because it’s what Medicare Advantage is, and that’s actually cheaper and better than Original Medicare.

Providing universal catastrophic care with savings accounts is another approach that has shown empirical success. It’s how Singapore’s health care system works, and it is widely regarded to be the most efficient healthcare system among the advanced economies.

> Why not just adopt one of the competing alternatives wholesale and admit defeat?

I agree! If it were up to me, we would adopt Singapore’s system wholesale. Either that, or, Switzerland’s. Or we would just have everyone in the US be on Medicare Advantage.


Because the working alternatives aren't nearly as lucrative for the health care industrial complex.




Consider applying for YC's Fall 2025 batch! Applications are open till Aug 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: