The protection rate oddly correlates with the hearsay that ~95% of people testing positive experience mild to moderate symptoms. I think I’m in the wrong business.
I don't think the study has measured whether vaccinated people are less contagious (or get infected). It's primarily measuring protection from disease.
Not even a baseless conspiracy theory, it's such a failure of basic reading comprehension that it borders on bad faith.
They gave the vaccine to a bunch of people, people in the control group got COVID 20 times more often than in the vaccine group, what's there to dispute?
No, that’s not what the statistics is saying. The compares the rate of symptomatic disease between vaccinated and unvaccinated groups in a double blind study.
The incidence of symptomatic people in two equal sized groups over time has reached 90 versus 5 in the unvaccinated versus vaccinated group.
