Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I severely doubt that someone would non-anonymously choose to be the single person that gave away the election to their declared opponent, weeks after being a loyal partisan.


If there's one thing I don't doubt, it's people's dedication to a president they believe is the only person fighting the 'deep state' and other things along those lines. I can easily see it spun (or justified) as "defending democracy" rather than upending it.


Then why didn't it happen with faithless electors in 2016?



Importantly, though:

"... only two... defected from the winner."




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: