Can't I just FORK it and change the Readme and/or tests to not include references to what could be constituted as infringing acts, and purposely state that the purpose of MY FORK is to download YouTube videos that are in the public domain?
If it's been taken down I am sure it will pop up on some torrent. The authors and all those who have contributed to it have copies.
How can a court tell me not to publish generally useful software with a legitimate intent?
If it's been taken down I am sure it will pop up on some torrent. The authors and all those who have contributed to it have copies.
How can a court tell me not to publish generally useful software with a legitimate intent?