> Stuff like this just proves that a large part of this job is just remembering a bunch of weird data points and knowing when to match this story to that problem.
I've hit Nagle far in the past, and reading the title I thought 'well that can't be about Nagle because that was a 200ms delay'
Looks like someone tuned it down to 40ms but didn't dare removing it. It would be interesting to know how they came to that choice
I've hit Nagle far in the past, and reading the title I thought 'well that can't be about Nagle because that was a 200ms delay'
Looks like someone tuned it down to 40ms but didn't dare removing it. It would be interesting to know how they came to that choice