Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin
Collection of low fidelity website wireframe templates (octopus.do)
25 points by losteden1 on Oct 13, 2020 | hide | past | favorite | 13 comments


It's amusing that the web crowd redefines standard graphics terms. A "wireframe" in graphics is a 3D model where only the edges are shown. This use of "wireframe" means something else entirely. In publishing, that's usually called a "layout".

In graphics, "rendering" refers to the final steps which generate the actual pixel values to be displayed. The web crowd uses "rendering" to mean creating the DOM to be displayed, which is still a long way from the pixels. Graphics people would call that creating the scene graph. This appears to be a concept created by Google.[1] For scraping purposes, Google runs most pages in a headless browser to build the final DOM. Then they scrape that. Thus, the Javascript gets executed before scraping. Google refers to that as "rendering", even though they don't take the last steps to generate a pixel image.

[1] https://webmasters.googleblog.com/2014/05/rendering-pages-wi...


I think it's simpler than that.

In web design, a "wireframe" used to be a line drawing of the boxes and controls available in HTML. Something like this:

https://wireframesketcher.com/samples/WireframeSketcherWin10...

So it was the 2D equivalent of the 3D graphics model you describe. And of course the wireframe you describe is itself a computer-modeled evolution of a literal wireframe -- a frame made with wires -- of a 3D physical object.

Web design wireframes were intentionally oversimplified so that discussions could focus on the data and flow instead of the final rendering, which was not decided yet (colors, art), and could vary between browsers. The best bikeshedding effort of the tech team holds no candle to that of design and product teams!

But black lines on white paper can be limiting too. They don't show well in client presentations. So colors were an inevitable addition. Varied font sizes and weights are useful to convey hierarchy. Rounded rects are free.

And then, if you've bought into a design language (Material, etc), you might as well use a higher-fidelity representation of the widgets...some of which are so simple that you might as well use the exact widget.

And so here we are. Lorem ipsum.


I'm confused. You suggest that templates are what you are offering, but this is a link to an app. Are you offering the wireframe templates themselves? Like, for example, ui8[1].

[1] https://ui8.net/craftwork/products/greyhound-ux-flowcharts


It is a link to a SaaS sitemap builder with a feature-limited free tier.


I will use this as its pretty and useful but just wondering is there a limit on the size of text... if the trend continues, it will be one character per 100vh.


The glaring grammatical error in the opening statement diminishes the perceived value of the site.


OMG Thanks for this, but where?


You are missing an "of" in the first sentence.

"We have 21 the most popular"


thank you guys. fixed


Hacker News folks.


Hacker News folks


This is really nicely from a UX standpoint.


Tnx




Consider applying for YC's Winter 2026 batch! Applications are open till Nov 10

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: