Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Thank You. In other words, it was not Open Office, per se that was cost saving, it was using Open Office as a tool to give less space to employees that was cost saving.

I mean you could have small cubicles too, I once worked in a office cubicles that physically could not fit anyone taller than 6"2. There are simply not enough leg room.



It's difficult to pack small cubicles and have them still really count as cubicles. Looking for some random pictures from Google Images, my office looks kind of like this: https://s3.amazonaws.com/mentoring.redesign/s3fs-public/open...

And here is a random picture of a small cubicle design: https://cubiclebydesign.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/Works...

Note the dividers in the center area extend back to the sides of the chairs, even though the chairs are not pushed in. If you tried to do that in the first image, you would block the walkway. (You certainly couldn't do the design of the farther-away cubicles; they take up much more room per employee.)

You could do something like this: https://www.quill.com/content/index/resource-center/office-f... But I'd probably call that an open office layout, honestly.


Thanks for putting the time and getting the image for illustration.

I guess I need some time to think deeply about it before it sinks in.




Consider applying for YC's Winter 2026 batch! Applications are open till Nov 10

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: