Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I don't think we even need Guile (though I wouldn't complain). Just cleaning up the way packages install (a proper package system, which could be optional) would be a vast improvement for elisp.

By creating a package system, making everything default into the el-user package if not otherwise specified, and moving the core elisp capabilities to the el/emacs-lisp package (used by el-user, importing everything), you'd create a clean path for moving forward. I have zero time and energy to contribute to emacs, but this is really the only fundamental change I'd want as someone who does delve into elisp frequently (or used to, not so much in the past year or so).



Personally, I would love Guile. There are just so many quirks to Elisp, and Scheme is more “known”.




Consider applying for YC's Winter 2026 batch! Applications are open till Nov 10

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: