> Patreon endorses its customers. Therefore they should police their platform as they see fit.
I'm sorry but that's what I've been saying, and you've been disagreeing with me.
> Amazon is completely different.
No, it's not.
Amazon Prime. They should police the content on there.
Amazon Marketplace. They should police the products that are sold on there. Blood diamonds should not be for sale on Amazon.
> If Amazon hires a Nazi as a warehouse worker
There are many things Amazon does. I've highlighted some where yes, Amazon should police themselves, and not support Nazis. You've highlighted one (laborers with Nazi views) where Amazon should maybe turn a blind eye.
What about the Direct of Communications? The VP of Human Resources? Is it okay if Amazon hires a self-avowed white supremacist, card-carrying member of the Nazi party, for a senior leadership position? I'd say they should avoid it. I might even boycott them if they kept someone like that in a senior leadership position.
> Amazon can decide to not let Nazis be in charge of press releases
Again, you're agreeing with me. Why do you pretend like you're not. You are 100% agreeing with me, and occasionally pointing out edge cases that I agree with.
> Don't you see the huge difference?
I agree there is a difference, and there are situations in which (as you agree), Amazon should police Nazi's out. That is my position, and you agree with it, and you've spent a great many words telling me I'm wrong.
Nazi behavior is immoral. Companies that support Nazis are wrong. Hiring a menial laborer who happens to be a Nazi, who doesn't bring it up at work, is probably fine. I hope they're exposed to people from other backgrounds, and stop being a fricking Nazi.
I'm sorry but that's what I've been saying, and you've been disagreeing with me.
> Amazon is completely different.
No, it's not.
Amazon Prime. They should police the content on there.
Amazon Marketplace. They should police the products that are sold on there. Blood diamonds should not be for sale on Amazon.
> If Amazon hires a Nazi as a warehouse worker
There are many things Amazon does. I've highlighted some where yes, Amazon should police themselves, and not support Nazis. You've highlighted one (laborers with Nazi views) where Amazon should maybe turn a blind eye.
What about the Direct of Communications? The VP of Human Resources? Is it okay if Amazon hires a self-avowed white supremacist, card-carrying member of the Nazi party, for a senior leadership position? I'd say they should avoid it. I might even boycott them if they kept someone like that in a senior leadership position.
> Amazon can decide to not let Nazis be in charge of press releases
Again, you're agreeing with me. Why do you pretend like you're not. You are 100% agreeing with me, and occasionally pointing out edge cases that I agree with.
> Don't you see the huge difference?
I agree there is a difference, and there are situations in which (as you agree), Amazon should police Nazi's out. That is my position, and you agree with it, and you've spent a great many words telling me I'm wrong.
Nazi behavior is immoral. Companies that support Nazis are wrong. Hiring a menial laborer who happens to be a Nazi, who doesn't bring it up at work, is probably fine. I hope they're exposed to people from other backgrounds, and stop being a fricking Nazi.