Yep, I've read all that before. I didn't mean to focus the discussion on the resampling--what I was trying to get across is, this codec acts differently than codecs that have been extensively tested and ABXed at high bitrates for years. I didn't even mention other factors like how it injects noise into bands on purpose (where you can also find references claiming that's a benefit and not a downside, of course). It was about a year ago, but beyond my own ABX testing I looked around quite a bit, and didn't see many high-bitrate tests out there. All the focus seemed to be on the 64kbit range.
This should not matter to me personally, as I have proven to myself that pretty low bitrates are transparent to me, regardless of the codec. But... I have the same psychosis that a lot of people have, where I think I can hear differences when I know which is which.
If space were an issue I'd use 90kbit/s opus (that was the threshold for me in my testing). It's actually pretty amazing, but since I have the storage space, I archive FLAC and carry around 256kbit/s vorbis, and don't even question the quality. It's easier to use more space than to fix my faulty perception!
This should not matter to me personally, as I have proven to myself that pretty low bitrates are transparent to me, regardless of the codec. But... I have the same psychosis that a lot of people have, where I think I can hear differences when I know which is which.
If space were an issue I'd use 90kbit/s opus (that was the threshold for me in my testing). It's actually pretty amazing, but since I have the storage space, I archive FLAC and carry around 256kbit/s vorbis, and don't even question the quality. It's easier to use more space than to fix my faulty perception!