Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Well, maybe, maybe not.

At least, it incentivizes Amazon to chase the culprits. The question is whether that incentive is big enough for them to fix / improve things.



If Amazon can get sued every time someone burns themselves with a knockoff product, I would think their incentives would shift from:

"Pay as little as possible for quality assurance, down to a floor of $0"

to

"Pay as little as possible for quality assurance, down to a floor of $whatever number would convince a court that we made a good faith effort to prevent knockoffs."


Strict liability means that Amazon is liable for any defective product no matter how "hard" they tried




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: