Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Ah, I like that! Yes, re-frame the wrong statement into a correct one, then keep going. Feels better than ignoring it. (I wouldn't introduce ratios though, that's a totally new concept.)

This is closer to what the teacher actually did—but then she became focused on explaining why the original supposition was wrong, as opposed to moving on to clearer examples.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: