Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

> We believe JavaScript is the natural choice for dynamic language tooling; whether in a browser environment or as standalone processes.

I disagree with this assessment. Lua is still far superior as an embed-able scripting language/runtime. I suspect the preference for JavaScript is mostly due to the Deno developers' familiarity and preference.




> Lua is far superior

I disagree with this assessment.


LuaJIT is nearly 3x faster than V8 JavaScript the last time I checked. Just anecodal DDG search [0]. Maybe V8 has gotten faster since the last time I checked.

[0] https://duckduckgo.com/?t=ffab&q=is+luajit+faster+than+v8+ja...


I think a big part of the point is to build a js runtime for existing js code and libraries.

Probably it will not replace node soon, but it is a possible outcome.

Also didn't luajit had the problem that it would never move to more recent version of lua? I remember that some years ago there was some talking about this.


Lua also has a smaller footprint I think.


It has a worse standard library than Javascript. And its static typing solutions don't compare to Typescript.


Funnily enough the state of art in typed lua is typescript: https://github.com/TypeScriptToLua/TypeScriptToLua


It depends what you mean by "superior". JavaScript (well v8) is far safer as a scripting runtime. And there are a ton of existing JS libs for solving problems. AND there's TypeScript, which is pretty great.


i suspect it is more that the whole world is familiar.




Consider applying for YC's Fall 2025 batch! Applications are open till Aug 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: