> We believe JavaScript is the natural choice for dynamic language tooling; whether in a browser environment or as standalone processes.
I disagree with this assessment. Lua is still far superior as an embed-able scripting language/runtime. I suspect the preference for JavaScript is mostly due to the Deno developers' familiarity and preference.
LuaJIT is nearly 3x faster than V8 JavaScript the last time I checked. Just anecodal DDG search [0]. Maybe V8 has gotten faster since the last time I checked.
I think a big part of the point is to build a js runtime for existing js code and libraries.
Probably it will not replace node soon, but it is a possible outcome.
Also didn't luajit had the problem that it would never move to more recent version of lua? I remember that some years ago there was some talking about this.
It depends what you mean by "superior". JavaScript (well v8) is far safer as a scripting runtime. And there are a ton of existing JS libs for solving problems. AND there's TypeScript, which is pretty great.
I disagree with this assessment. Lua is still far superior as an embed-able scripting language/runtime. I suspect the preference for JavaScript is mostly due to the Deno developers' familiarity and preference.