>3. Inexcusable renaming and name collisions on basic Lisp functions.
Given that it isn't a version of common lisp that happens to target the jvm being more superficially similar while actually being substantially different wouldn't be a virtue. It would confuse more than it would illuminate.
>3. Inexcusable renaming and name collisions on basic Lisp functions.
Given that it isn't a version of common lisp that happens to target the jvm being more superficially similar while actually being substantially different wouldn't be a virtue. It would confuse more than it would illuminate.