Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> because they don't have the manpower to manually review everything.

Because they don't want to pay for the manpower to manually review everything.

Youtube gets 250-300 million hours of video uploaded every year. At $20 an hour to review it, that's $6b. Call it $10b.

Alphabet made $86b last year.



It’s possible that a human review system would be even worse. Have you seen the studies that show how insurance adjusters, working from the same inputs, with clear evaluation rules, have spreads of > 40% for the same case?


> Alphabet made $86b last year.

They did not, and I'm curious where the mixup came from. They did $46.1b in revenue fiscal year 2019, and $10.7b in profits.

https://techcrunch.com/2020/02/03/alphabet-earnings-show-goo...


https://www.macrotrends.net/stocks/charts/GOOG/alphabet/gros...

Alphabet gross profit for the twelve months ending September 30, 2019 was $86.264B, a 16.62% increase year-over-year.


I find it highly unlikely that more than 1/8th of Alphabet's profits are coming from YT, so that'd make it a cost center... and I'm willing to bet it'd be deep deep in the red.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: