Without a very clever decompiler, I'd say `ugly'. | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

eru on Feb 14, 2011 | parent | context | favorite | on: Stuxnet is now on GitHub

Without a very clever decompiler, I'd say `ugly'.

gloob on Feb 14, 2011 [–]

I admit to basing this on nothing more than a gut feeling, but a "sufficiently smart decompiler" seems even less plausible than a "sufficiently smart compiler".

eru on Feb 14, 2011 | [–]

My first version was just `ugly'. But I guarded it.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact