> So, someone takes a peek under the covers, and it turns out actix-web is using a lot of unsafe code. That’s not inherently a problem. The problem is, a lot of that unsafe code is not actually needed. This is where things start to go wrong.

Can anyone link to a discussion in which the actix-web maintainer explains his position at a technical level?

The article leaves me baffled at why the maintainer was so unreceptive to concerns about the use of unsafe.