Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> Third, for almost all species, there are no density figures, so he just picked the number 10

This is contradicted by the statement put out by the university of Sydney: https://sydney.edu.au/news-opinion/news/2020/01/03/a-stateme...

> Basically some guy just made up a number of animals that exist

"some guy" who has published literally hundreds of peer-reviewed articles on related subjects: https://sydney.edu.au/law/about/people/publications/chris.di...



>> Third, for almost all species, there are no density figures, so he just picked the number 10

>This is contradicted by the statement put out by the university of Sydney: https://sydney.edu.au/news-opinion/news/2020/01/03/a-stateme....

I quickly skimmed the source that you've linked, and it says nothing about how they handled species with no density figures.


The original report he based his estimate on does: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/318029981_Impacts_o...

> how they handled species with no density figures

Many species were excluded from estimates because there is insufficient information on their abundance. The largest omission is the entire NSW bat fauna (37 species), for which no information on density could be found. (page 16)


I quickly skimmed the source...

As the sibling comment notes, this is addressed in the source material. Consider engaging more productively before posting dismissive comments on HN.




Consider applying for YC's Winter 2026 batch! Applications are open till Nov 10

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: