Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

There are plenty of reasons to learn new languages and frameworks. Dismissing them because of 'new and shiny' is not a good reason.


The only reason to learn most of these frameworks is if your line of work has a high chance you’d inherit, need to support, and/or build new features on top of such a code base.

Otherwise, we don’t need 10 different tools for building—what is at the end of the day—a simple website or CRUD application.

Complexity isn’t a good thing. Creating complexity is the first sign of inexperienced coders.


One good reason is to learn different ways of doing things. I think the best way to understand why something is the way it is is to look at different ways it could be done and what are the pro/cons of it.

I've seen many times that trying and understanding a new framework leads to me implementing something in a better way in a framework I was already using.


> Dismissing them because of 'new and shiny' is not a good reason.

How about putting a pin on technologies that are unproven and immature? Because many projects (and careers) have died a painful death because an overeager developer decided to bet the farm on a shiny flavor of the month because it was trending.


Sure, but this is the objection to the substance of the response, not the way it is delivered (which is what the parent comment is unhappy about).




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: