> trying to force people to pay for an extra feature (debugging through code w/o source) that many people simply don't want
Isn't that the way software businesses work? They build features that they hope will convince people to pay for upgrades or renewals. If people don't want the new feature, the company won't make any money.
It doesn't seem to be an evil or malicious route to me; it's just charging for something which was free before because they can no longer maintain it that way.
Isn't that the way software businesses work? They build features that they hope will convince people to pay for upgrades or renewals. If people don't want the new feature, the company won't make any money.
It doesn't seem to be an evil or malicious route to me; it's just charging for something which was free before because they can no longer maintain it that way.