>What is your incentive in supporting an invasion?
Isolationism and appeasement post-WWI leading to the next, disastrous world war which could have been avoided or significantly diminished with early intervention.
Seriously, mind your own stuff. How would you feel if some other country parks an aircraft carrier group in US waters, because the US
- has a racial discrimination problem?
- invades citizen's privacy through wire tapping?
- the presidential election is just a funny show?
...
By provoking people, threatening to send aircraft carriers?
The fact is this is just a leverage US is holding on to to win the trade war.
Human rights have been the excuse the US used to wage war against multiple middle east countries in the past 30 years, eventually for its own benefit, and causing huge sufferings to people in these countries.
No one can say no to 'supporting human rights', but you'd be naive to think the US cares about human rights more than it does about benefiting itself and inflicting suffering on other countries.
Also, maybe it's turning out that building the wall is not that profitable after all.
> park an aircraft carrier group in HK waters.
This is called invasion.
What is your incentive in supporting an invasion?