No it isn't, it literally isn't. A company's job is to be competitive. While there may be all sorts of libertarian apologists out there anti-competitive action is still... anti-compeititive.
Apple's walled garden of an app store among various other tactics aren't about producing a better product - they're about preventing competing products.
I beg to differ. The App store is known to have a higher quality bar for apps than the play store, and that’s helped by the $100 developer fee and strict review processes.
Not to mention Google tries hard to employ the same practices (you have to do some really roundabout stuff to install non-Play store apks).
This article on how to install the Amazon App store and third party APKs pretty much sums up the situation. On the surface it seems like a great idea to allow third party apps, but in practice it actually leads to a degraded experience, viruses, and vulnerabilities, as evidenced by the editor’s note at the top of the article recommending against doing what the article is saying.
No it isn't, it literally isn't. A company's job is to be competitive. While there may be all sorts of libertarian apologists out there anti-competitive action is still... anti-compeititive.
Apple's walled garden of an app store among various other tactics aren't about producing a better product - they're about preventing competing products.