Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Their sole innovation over that is that they realized neutrality and being a third party is valuable because of regulation. Haha, this is pretty clever.


Similarly, there is a business computing custom indices that a bank uses in products. The bank is perfectly capable of computing the index itself, but it needs to be handled by a third party that is paid handsomely to just re-calculate what the bank already calculated.


One example of that is Markit Group, which had revenue of $1.5bn/yr when it merged with IHS in 2016 at an implied valuation of roughly $5.5bn. Best London startup of the last 25 years, including DeepMind, not close.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Markit

Being a trusted third party is frequently an amazing business, if you can earn or negotiate your way there.


For this to work, don't they have to be the exclusive means of getting stock information for a bank? So everyone who owns bank stock in a bank that uses banclist must agree to use it to get all shareholder disclosure information?


Probably the opposite. Bank signs deal with banclist, notifies shareholders official information disclosures will only be done through banclist.




Consider applying for YC's Fall 2025 batch! Applications are open till Aug 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: