Yes, he merely gave us the greatest operating system of human history for free. Such an incredible lack of generosity.
By the way, I read this quote as a sincere attempt to understand what was going on in the mind of some people. I am afraid the actual explanation may be a bit more prosaic. A monolithic kernel might -o horror of horrors- be quite mundane. And where is the tenure in that?
I'm a confirmed Linux user [switched from macOS], but to me it's clear that git dwarfs Linux in terms of sheer _significance_.
Sure, Linux is what runs most big systems and that is really cool, but if Linux hadn't come around, there was already BSD [which is also good and a lotta my buddies were advocating in the mid-late 90s]. But git is quite unique and has / had no easy substitute. I don't [personally] know a single technology person who doesn't use or interact with git daily. And the benefits of reliable, free/open, and distributed version control are just monumental for the average working code stiff.
He has been quite open about being too abrasive in the service of directness/bluntness in the past.
At the same time, the OS research field really was like this at that time. At MIT, for example, it felt a bit like “which flavor of exokernel would you like to study?”
"I don’t necessarily think these researchers were knowingly dishonest. Perhaps they were simply stupid. Or deluded."