> a1369209993's example snippet appears to be what is implied from section 6 ("REPLACING FORK"), subsection "Low-level: Cross-process operations"
Oh definitely. But why are they saying it "looks kind of familiar..."? That subsection is already the subject of the conversation. Surely they're not saying it looks similar to itself, right?
Ahh. I thought it was familiar because it was the way one would write that sort of code now, in a fork/exec environment, only replacing the call to change local information into ones to change the child's information.
Oh definitely. But why are they saying it "looks kind of familiar..."? That subsection is already the subject of the conversation. Surely they're not saying it looks similar to itself, right?