Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Firefox has worse performance than Chrome overall, despite what their synthetic benchmarks might say.



That probably has nothing to do that everyone is now optimizing for Chrome.


How are you measuring 'overall'?


I am not measuring it, that's the point. Synthetic benchmarks are useless when real life experience shows the opposite.


As an enlightened individual as I'm sure you are, we strive to remove personal bias when possible. This includes measuring statistics. Which can take the form of synthetic benchmarks, but also real life tests, like page load times of notoriously bad news sites, or heavy cpu bound tasks like image resizing in the browser.


If you're not measuring it then it's pretty much subjective, no? You can't quantify what you don't measure.

I don't know how you use Firefox and Chrome (I use both in work) but they behave pretty much identically as far as I can tell, once ads and other crap have been blocked.

The only difference is Chrome is snappier on Google sites and seems to use double the memory to open the same tabs.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: