BSD: Due to resistance from the BSD community to adhere to normal free software development practices, we currently have no plans to have official Pale Moon releases of any kind on the range of BSD operating systems.
Wow, that got out of hand quickly. Like in a matter of minutes.
At first I was thinking, "Oh, neat. A browser I know nothing about. Maybe I'll give it a try."
After reading how multiple Pale Moon people acted in that thread, I'll pass. I've worked with people like that in the past, and I don't want to support them in any way, or validate their work.
Wow, those guys sure know how to not make friends. Last I checked choice of bundled or system libraries is normally reserved for distro packagers, and one would really hope the system libs win out wherever possible!
Worse than that: he threatened to sue OpenBSD 3 hours after the OpenBSD developer working on the port specifically asked for permission to use different compile flags on Palemoon forums!
Mozilla Firefox also has a similar clause in their license agreement. Modified versions of the browser are not allowed to use the Firefox trademark, which is why Debian for years would use the Iceweasel name instead.
I don't think MOzilla ever threatened legal action out of the gate like that though.
I'm also curious about their reasoning, since they have an OS X release in development. What is it about BSD that doesn't adhere to normal free software development practices, but OS X does?
Anyone got the story on this one?