Weellll, it's okay. It does what it does, but what it does is not really for me. Sure, I'd like to click on hot chicks, but you know what I'd really love? If, when I clicked on that chick long enough, she begins to like me! Then she calls me and buys me dinner.
Now that's a problem you startup founders should solve! Getting me laid is a killer application, I tell you.
That's a problem that's been solved with various degrees of legality all around the world from time immemorial. I don't think that'll get anyone to an IPO. It might result in some book and movie deals, a clothing line, or a popular blog. (Heidi Fleiss and "Confessions of a College Call Girl" come to mind.)
I may well be alone in this view and I really don't want to sound rude but personally I just can't get excited about another one of these sites. It seems the successful ones (e.g. hotornot) in this area were the ones which were both original and fun. Unfortunately, I don't think this is either. Looks beautiful and I'm sure a lot of work went into it, but not for me. I feel bad, maybe I shouldn't have posted! Hmm..
This is a neat little app. Not really ground-breaking, but hey, that's not a pre-requisite for success. That said, I think this is just a web base comparator, not a startup. I must be missing something, but what pain point are you soothing? How is this new? The fact that you have categories? Are you hoping to take all the results data and try to pull something useful out of it? Or is this just a "hey, let's learn rails and make a facebook app" type thing?
Well done. Simple enough. Fun to use. I'll probably never use it again, but I'm sure there are many millions of people that would spend a dozen minutes or so on this site. With that kind of traffic, I think you have a good shot of success. My prediction is that the celebrity comparison will be the most popular, followed by the user submissions. It's fun to look at pretty faces. It would be interesting to see the patterns and clusters that develop in your data. That would be very cool if you shared the statistics with the community(or if you ever need a data junky to volunteer an analyze your database shoot me a message). Good luck.
What isn't recommended is the implication that the site is somehow sponsored by facebook, which I think they will feel this site tries to do. Intentional or not.
Well, it looks nice, but what am I supposed to do? Why should I vote for "me" and what the hell is a challenge? First time users need to know what's going on. I left after 30 seconds.
Seems to be essentially a "Hot or Not" type app, essentially CommandShift3 but back to using people. My first thought is what incentive is there to participate? I guess those that submit pictures get bragging rights, which may be enough for some, but I see no motive for people to vote.
The facebook link in the corner makes it look like a phishing site to me. It looks so similar to facebook and has the tag that if I can across this site on my own I'd leave immediately as I'd feel the site was out to steal my identity.
Was it TechCrunch that recently pointed to Zuckerberg's original notes on his pre-Facebook project as the source for uLiken's inspiration? Comparing the harvard kids in the facebook to farm animals on something like hot or not?
Is there any benefit (other than it's easier) to have all the different categories on the same site?
To me, it seems that "a site that lets you compare stuff" is less appealing than "a site that lets you compare girls", "a site that lets you compare cars", "a site that lets you compare pets" tied together in a loose network and with similar branding.
Also, I should be able to vote by just clicking on the image I like more :p
Now that's a problem you startup founders should solve! Getting me laid is a killer application, I tell you.