Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Search is probably the most likely counterexample of your rule. They can sell ads based on search terms instead of user profiles. This might be leaving some profit on the table, but might not.

They can generate artificial scarcity by preventing the search query stream from being joined to user profiles by third parties.

If they end up with a well-educated, affluent userbase (likely, given their selling point), they can charge a huge premium for that scarcity.

This trick is much older than the internet itself.




If they are advertising to me based on my search string, I'm still the product. Ads are part of what I'd pay to evade.


Do you object to companies advertising to you based on the magazines you buy, or tv you watch, or roads you travel to work on?

If you are against advertising full stop then fine. This article, and peoples claimed grievances are with tracking, rather than advertising per se.

Edit: Missed your first post. Ignore me.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: