>
The fact this was broken by stealing a developer's SDK is disappointing. Real hackers would have disassembled the machine to reverse engineer it, rather than using black market/social engineering tricks.
You cannot assume that an attacker will have an "honor code" or that you can keep information secret from an attacker. Because of the latter one, there exists Kerckhoff's principle
Well, I found it disappointing just from a story standpoint. I certainly wanted to read a story about clever technical hack...about someone sniffing a memory bus and writing a program to align the dump to get a valid program, or finding a complex pattern by analyzing the scrambling by hand.
I suppose it's a good reminder that in the real world, the easiest way in is often through a gullible or untrustworthy employee.
You cannot assume that an attacker will have an "honor code" or that you can keep information secret from an attacker. Because of the latter one, there exists Kerckhoff's principle
> https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kerckhoffs%27s_pr...
which on a high level states that security by obscurity will in the long run become broken (and as a corollary DRM does not work).