Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> I'm arguing that mere truth is unknowable without faith

Does the infantry man's faith in ballistic charts affect where a mortar will land? Yes it turned out that Newtonian physics doesn't describe absolute truth, but it sure is useful if you need to blow that enemy up over on that hill.

> one of our priors must be that there is some probability that the very mind that is doing the thinking may be of a nature that is unable to effectively reason.

An interesting thought experiment, but what practical use can I apply it to?

btw I'm not implying that only lines of inquiry that result in practical uses are worthwhile, but, science for the most part is related to this.

I guess there is a distinction to be drawn between faith and blind faith. "Faith" in the atomic model allowed prediction of elements that had not yet been discovered. That faith was rewarded when the elements turned up exactly where expected (even though the orbital model of electrons turned out not to be the absolute truth). "Faith" in Einsteins theories required a belief in time dilation. Turns out we can't have GPS without accounting for it.

This is quite different to, for example, religious faith which so far has not had any of these predictive powers.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: