It's not the curved edge that is causing the problem. The bullets are actually partly off the actual edge of the screen and are being clipped.
If I rotate the device to landscape mode, then the page adds some margin and the bullets aren't clipped any more. I didn't look at the page source in detail - perhaps it is using some kind of media query on the width and reducing the left margin on a narrow screen.
I think the real lesson here is that many of these tricks to achieve some kind of "typographical correctness" are simply a bad idea. Users don't expect it, and it's very likely to break on some device you haven't tested.
People who view your page aren't looking for typographical correctness. They are looking for something easy to read that is familiar and comfortable and works on whatever device they happen to be using. The more tricks you put in, the less likely you are to achieve that.
And honestly, some of this just seems weird, even for print. I don't read much on paper any more, it's all phone/PC/Kindle. But I just thumbed through a bunch of my old books, and none of them follow the "correct" conventions. Bullet lists, (a) (b) (c) lists, and 1. 2. 3. lists are all indented much like the default web formatting. They don't outdent a quote mark at the beginning of a paragraph, the quote mark just appears in the first column like any other character.
I don't know where the author got these ideas about "correctness", because I sure don't see it in my professionally typeset books.
If I rotate the device to landscape mode, then the page adds some margin and the bullets aren't clipped any more. I didn't look at the page source in detail - perhaps it is using some kind of media query on the width and reducing the left margin on a narrow screen.
I think the real lesson here is that many of these tricks to achieve some kind of "typographical correctness" are simply a bad idea. Users don't expect it, and it's very likely to break on some device you haven't tested.
People who view your page aren't looking for typographical correctness. They are looking for something easy to read that is familiar and comfortable and works on whatever device they happen to be using. The more tricks you put in, the less likely you are to achieve that.
And honestly, some of this just seems weird, even for print. I don't read much on paper any more, it's all phone/PC/Kindle. But I just thumbed through a bunch of my old books, and none of them follow the "correct" conventions. Bullet lists, (a) (b) (c) lists, and 1. 2. 3. lists are all indented much like the default web formatting. They don't outdent a quote mark at the beginning of a paragraph, the quote mark just appears in the first column like any other character.
I don't know where the author got these ideas about "correctness", because I sure don't see it in my professionally typeset books.