Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Ah, that makes sense. A conscious choice to trade high salaries for high security, I assume?


A more paternalistic approach by the state.

It adds more protection by law for the population less likely to purchase such protection out of their pocket.

It’s probably less efficient but less ruthless for those who do not know any better and could easily become homeless shortly after losing a job.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: