Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Private prisons house a tiny fraction of US inmates, an estimated 8% in 2015[0] and the federal numbers are exclusively for the detention of foreigners illegally in the country.

[0]: http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/04/11/u-s-private-...



I'm a prison abolitionist. Your reply could not possibly fall on ears that care less about your point.


You were the one who mentioned financial incentives/conflicts vis-a-vis private prisons.


Upvoted that one though - this begs the question:

should you construct an argument only by its premise, or should you try to reach the person? I think [s]he assumed that you are not a prison abolitionist and tried to find an argument that might sway you.

Is it better or worse to argue like that?


There was no prior mention of the person being a prison abolitionist. There was mention of concern about private prisons. I don't know how I am to intuit what a person is truly concerned about vs. what they state they are concerned about.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: