Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

>because obviously you wouldn't find evidence of psychic phenomena

If they had found proof of said phenomena, wouldn't it make sense for them to convince the public they had not? To prevent others from looking into the subject while researching it farther and weaponizing it?

After all, one of the agency's prime purposes (as stated by a former director) is to control the narrative of society - to shape commonly held views:

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false" [1].

The American public is pretty well convinced that 'psychic phenomena' isn't real. While this belief is potentially organic, is it that far out of line to question it, considering the striking similarities between mystical belief systems of ancient societies who had no contact with each other (Egypt & Tibet, for example) and the CIA's stated campaign to shape public opinions?

Not directly opposing your statement, just playing devil's advocate around the word 'obviously'.

[1] Former CIA Directory William Casey [via Barbara Honegger]



Consider applying for YC's Winter 2026 batch! Applications are open till Nov 10

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: