Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

I feel ya and it would make my feel a little better about my meat treats, but improving that end (pun) of the equation seems to be a smaller problem than the energy required.

> The findings, while expected, are quite sobering. Pork, chicken, dairy and eggs are equivalent within a factor of two when it came to their environmental burdens, the authors determined. But beef requires far, far more resources than any of those other protein categories. The team calculated that beef requires 28 times more land, six times more fertilizer and 11 times more water compared to those other food sources. That adds up to about five times more greenhouse gas emissions.

https://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/beef-uses-ten-...




Impossible Burger revolution is a better solution than an incremental improvement.


Pork and chicken require less land? Could that be because they're usually kept in cages?


no, it is because their food conversion ratio is better. that anaerobic methane producing process cows are using is not very efficient.


yea it seems weird that the methane would be the only thing to keep OP up at night...




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: