Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Depends on the state I would assume, but of course IANAL. Some states have single party consent, and you're certainly not in a private area. You'd have to look into the eavesdropping laws where you live. You realize that many buildings have security cameras, right?

I'm still very confused as to why you believe that your communications over a company owned platform should/would be private.



>> I'm still very confused as to why you believe that your communications over a company owned platform should/would be private.

Is this a generational thing? When I got my first job, there were cultural norms about not making personal calls on the company phone (this was a time when people still used paper for memos) or using company resources like copiers.

While I realize times have changed and things appear much more relaxed today, I don't understand why people would even think to use company owned devices/servers/resources for personal stuff for anything short of an emergency.


because I dont see the difference between having direct conversation vs having electronic conversation in the office premises. why would there be different rules for them?


Well, one is a platform provided specifically for work related communications (again, like your email). Also, read the above linked article which discusses wiretapping:

>employers are given an exemption for calls made “in the ordinary course of business.” Courts interpret this to mean that employers can eavesdrop on all business telephone calls but cannot listen to or record messages it knows are personal.

Also:

>ECPA also applies to audio monitoring of the workplace. Employers can install recording devices in any location that is used primarily for work. But employers may not conduct audio recording of nonworking areas such as cafeterias, break rooms, or locker rooms. In practice, this means little because employers are not required to notify employees that they are being recorded and employees are unlikely to discover the hidden microphone.

So there is an obvious legal distinction between communications which are intended to be work related and those which are not. In your cafeteria example, no, they should not (assuming this article is the entire story.) However, your slack messages are not considered the same as a cafeteria conversation.

Again, I'm not a lawyer and have zero real knowledge here, but I think it's silly to expect privacy in your work provided messaging system.


Because one of them is almost literally a paper trail and the other is ephemeral?


But if you record the ephemeral, there is essentially no difference.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: