I think you and I are in 100% agreement, because I didn't try to ad-hominem all people who value nature, I was being a very tiny bit reductionistic in describing a large vocal population, which are people who demonize technology or our current state because it doesn't fit into their personal narrative (often surprisingly fed by many 90's movies).
So I was targeting it towards the idiocy of the original author, not of those on every side that realize nuance and balance are just as important.
So I was targeting it towards the idiocy of the original author, not of those on every side that realize nuance and balance are just as important.