If you go to their "packages" page[1] and select "premium", it gives you a table with "requests (per period)" and "month-to-month (price per period), and it is indeed "up to 100" for $99.00. For up to 500 tweets per request.
Seems pretty clear, though I can't fathom why they chose "periods" rather than "months". Crazy expensive.
It sure seems that way. If I understand their copy correctly this looks really really really expensive. I'm assuming the tweets per request is the limit to the result set returned, which is crazy small.
I mean, you've got to think someone has done an expected demand / price model and decided that this will maximize profits. Only people they need to justify to are shareholders.
If there is one thing I despise about tech companies nowadays it is how everything always reduces down to advertising or marketing analytics. They are turning marketing people into some of the most obnoxiously demanding folks out there
Too late. They killed their own platform not providing good API services. When everybody was interested in connecting with Twitter they didn't provide options, now Twitter is falling and it would be very difficult to attract interest.
Is there a parameter to exclude tweets from bogus accounts? Twitter has clearly identified these and they've been disappearing by the millions, but will they still appear in the search archive?
It'd be nice to exclude those tweets, and given the very expensive API calls, only pay for non-human tweets when explicitly desired.