It seems pretty appropriate to use CWA's past as an argument against CWA, since the article is about CWA.

Well they haven't actually used their past actions, they've just said that they've been "failed". Seems like if you're on an anti-union bend you could give specifics rather than vague complaints?

> Seems like if you're on an anti-union bend you could give specifics rather than vague complaints?

I'm not the person complaining about CWA. That's the user "packetized."

You don't get to make a "bad apples" argument against unions. It's 100% of the point of unionization that all workers in an industry are bound by its decisions with no recourse. If you find your industry's union to be piss poor, you can suck it up or find a different line of work.

That would be much worse than the current situation for software engineers, where if you find your boss's decisions to be piss poor, you can go get a better offer down the street.