The world wide change in 1914 was going from the gold standard to a fiat money system.
> exchange rates of currency
That was not the topic, the topic was instability in the money supply.
> Nixon
The US official exchange rate was a fiction from 1930-Nixon, because it was illegal to hold gold as a monetary instrument. Nixon simply did away with the fiction.
NO. Just before the war, the war scare blew up the exchange system. It's in the book cited. History. Empiricism. Data.
Now you want to change the topic away from EITHER economic stability OR exchange rate stability? To money supply stability, a whole other topic? Yikes.
Nixon - cavilling. Choose any illustration and the logic and semantics of "fiat" remain. Once again, you're off on a new topic, a new distraction. Not only is that not logical, it's not civil, either.
> exchange rates of currency
That was not the topic, the topic was instability in the money supply.
> Nixon
The US official exchange rate was a fiction from 1930-Nixon, because it was illegal to hold gold as a monetary instrument. Nixon simply did away with the fiction.